Testimonals
The Honorable Michael M. Baylson, United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania (October 25, 2021): The Court approves, as to form and content, the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action (the “Notice”), the Proof of Claim and Release form (the “Proof of Claim”), and the Summary Notice, annexed hereto as Exhibits A-1, A-2, and A-3, respectively, and finds that the mailing and distribution of the Notice and publishing of the Summary Notice, substantially in the manner and form set forth in 7-10 of this Order, meet the requirements of Rule 23 and due process, and is the best notice practicable under the circumstances and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to all Persons entitled thereto.
PELLETIER v. ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC
Case No. 2:17-cv-05114
United States Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron stated, “The Court finds that the claims process administered by Angeion has integrity and has been carried out in a diligent and thorough manner…Based upon the Court’s review of the record, the Court finds that Angeion has taken prudent and necessary steps to address the fraudulent claims submitted in this case… Angeion’s fraud detection system is robust and appropriately designed to weed out fraudulent claims.”
Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation
No. 1:18-cv-04361-AKH-SDA, S.D.N.Y, Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 667